Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Featured

Huge Fight Erupts After Scumbag Olympic Officials Took It From White Athletes And Gave It To Muslims!

Published

on

The US Olympic Committee when into the Winter Games with an agenda of diversity, which included ensuring that there was a fair mix of races and sexual orientation among the medalist. Basically, awards are allegedly being determined by affirmative action and not actual ability. This also reaches into other aspects of the games, such as the US Hockey Team being put on notice that there are too many white players this year and that’s not going to be acceptable for next time and could affect their success this year.

With all of this ridiculous divisiveness, it’s no wonder that officials were so quick to bend over backward for Muslims at the games. However, now, the people they were giving something special too are now raging mad for a new reason.

Muslims in South Korea are raging after what they just had taken away from them. I bet you thought they lost a gold medal or perhaps a one-way-ticket to 72 virgins, but that’s not quite the case just yet. They can’t handle what just happened, and they’ll have to adapt to real-life situations just like everyone else when they’re faced with adversity. Victims of terror attacks orchestrated by Muslims are always reacting to the tragedy, but this time it was the Muslims who were faced with adversity.

It’s being reported that the Korea Tourism Organization, also known as the KTO, have eliminated plans to establish a prayer room for viewers. The reason is that people were protesting against the Muslim religion. Perhaps there was a level of untrust and disdain for those who believe in Islam after all the terror attacks have happened across the world.

It stated that over 56,000 signatures were collected in opposition and fear of radical Islamic terrorism taking place. Others have reported that there has already been enough taxpayer money spent on the Olympics and there was no need to spend any more on a special prayer room or give a specific religion special benefits. The strong opposition and desire to cut spending combined to eliminate the option of building a prayer room.

Yahoo reported more on the situation:
“We sat down with them for talks, but in the end, we had to cancel the plans,” Gangneung city government tourism division chief Kang Suk-ho told Al Jazeera.

The KTO’s Kim Yeong-ju told Korea Exposé’s Ho Kyeong Jang that opposition to the prayer rooms was so strong that local officials “could no longer do their jobs.”

Much of the hostility has flowed from the PyeongChang Olympics Gangwon Citizens’ Islam Countermeasure Association, a relatively new group that pushed a petition against the prayer room via Google. The petition — which stoked fear about radical Islam in the South Korean province of Gangwon — has collected more than 56,000 digital signatures.

“The government has already spent too much of the taxpayers’ money on the Games, and we shouldn’t spend more building a prayer room,” Seo Ji-hyun, the director of operations at the Islam Countermeasure Association, told Al Jazeera. He also suggested that Muslims should refrain from prayer at the Olympic Games as they supposedly would while flying or driving.

Islamophobia is nothing new in South Korea, where Muslims comprise just 0.2 percent of an overall population of 51 million. The Citizens’ Association for a Proper Country, a civic group led by Jeong Hyeong-man, has advocated against halal-friendly establishments and warned against “the increase of Muslim terrorist bases in Korea.”

Muslim athletes in PyeongChang still have access to a cafeteria serving certified halal food. And all visitors to the Winter Games who adhere to the faith can count on vociferous support from the Korean Muslim Federation.”

The world is probably still a bit on edge as the number of radical Islamic terror attacks have caused mass amounts of damage, destruction, and loss of life. People all across the world are not entirely trustworthy of the Muslim religion just yet. There’s plenty of reasons why, which is because of the terror attacks they’ve committed. There’s also the concept of child brides, female oppression, murdering gays, gang rape crimes by Muslim refugees, and the inability for many uncivilized Muslims to join the current century and assimilate to the social norms that are now accepted. For example, having a child bride is not genuinely acceptable anywhere, nor should it be.

Strapping explosives to one’s body and blowing themselves up in the name of their religion is not honorable, it’s awful. It destroys lives, property, and the person who commits that crime lose their own life and get nothing out of it.

Are the protesters who wouldn’t accept the prayer room for Muslims bad people? Not particularly. They’re probably not able to fully trust the members of the religion just yet. It takes time to build trust between people and groups of people.

Some may call it Islamaphobia, but others call it being precautious. When a group of people or a religion is individually responsible for a large number of terror attacks, then it makes sense for people to be a bit wary of welcoming someone into their country. Sometimes all the terror attacks aren’t worth it in the long run.

The general concept of the Muslim religion is very meager. It’s hard for people to be trusting of a group who continually commits acts of terror.

The world needs the good Muslims of the world to condemn the bad ones. The great, peaceful, and hard working Muslims must revolt against the radical Islamic terrorists who make their religion look horrible to everyone else.

Will that ever happen?

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Crime

WHOA! What 4 FL Cops Did During School Shooting Just Blew Entire Case WIDE Open!

Published

on

The investigation into how and why the Parkland, Florida school shooting got to the point where 17 innocent people were killed has left a lot more questions than answers since it began a week ago. It was initially revealed that the FBI had not followed protocol after receiving numerous calls from different individuals specific information that Nikolas Cruz was going to shoot up the school. It didn’t make sense that these credible threats went unaddressed, especially after proof was provided of the clear and present danger that Cruz was. Now, we’re learning what four Broward County, Florida deputies did during the attack, that blows this investigation wide open.

Over a few years leading up to the attack, Broward County cops were called on Cruz over 30 different times for legitimate reasons. Although the cops came out each time, none of these visits to the suspect ended action of any kind. There were more warning signs that necessary to do something about this individual, all of which were “ignored,” until it came to the fatal day they had been told was coming for months, if not years. As it turns out, this lack of action was no coincidence.

We previously reported about the on-campus a Deputy security officer who was the only person armed and Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, but when it came time to truly serve and protect the staff and students, he never went inside the building. Instead, Scot Peterson ran away from the scene and hid behind a cement pole as he heard the shots inside and victims screaming for their lives. However, Peterson wasn’t alone in his cowardly approach to the deadly scene.

The deputy said he did his duty by calling the cops to the scene rather than being the initial emergency responder as he was hired to be. Broward County police soon responded to his call, but four were as afraid as Peterson to go run into the building. Rather than saving lives, these four officers did something else, which has left survivors horrified.

The Daily Wire reports:

On Friday, CNN issued a shock report finding that earlier reports regarding Broward County Sheriff’s Deputy Scot Peterson — the armed school safety officer who apparently cowered outside the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School while a mass shooter slaughtered 17 people inside — were accurate, but that Peterson wasn’t the only officer waiting outside. According to CNN:

When Coral Springs police officers arrived at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, on February 14 in the midst of the school shooting crisis, many officers were surprised to find not only that Broward County Sheriff’s Deputy Scot Peterson, the armed school resource officer, had not entered the building, but that three other Broward County Sheriff’s deputies were also outside the school and had not entered, Coral Springs sources tell CNN. The deputies had their pistols drawn and were behind their vehicles, the sources said, and not one of them had gone into the school.

So there were four armed officers outside the school. And none of them did anything, according to CNN. They instead waited for Coral Springs police to lead the charge inside.

What makes this worse, is that one day after the attack, Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel had been reamed by Coral Springs City Manager Mike Goodrum over his officers’ failure to do their job and save people, which perhaps spurred the Sheriff on to go on a massive cover-up that has since divided the country.

When news came out about the resource officer hiding and not saving individuals, Israel publicly addressed the cowardly action, stating it made him sick. At this time, he knew his own officers had done the same and clearly ignore that fact, using Peterson as a distraction from his own department’s failures. This came a day after the sheriff had gone on CNN’s Town Hall in front of a weeping group of survivors and parents of the victims, blaming the National Rifle Association and gun advocate Dana Loesch for failing these students, when in fact it was his officers who did by refusing to go inside and save people.

It sure looks like all this talk of gun control, blaming the NRA and President Trump is nothing but smokescreens and mirrors to hide and deflect the overwhelming failure of law enforcement in this area. What’s truly sad is that this department gives the real heroes who wear a badge every day and run into harm’s way, a bad name they don’t deserve. Broward County police and the FBI failed these students, the staff, and the families who lost loved ones – not guns. Had these armed individuals used their weapons, lives would have been saved. That’s the message that these victims need to hear and share.

Continue Reading

Crime

BREAKING: 24Hrs After WH Lockdown, Van Rams Front Gate – Authorities Release Chilling Plot Behind It

Published

on

Tensions toward President Donald Trump have been escalating across the country over the past week since the Florida school shooting, which the left immediately came out blaming the president for. Targeting all their rage and fear toward him for his support of the Second Amendment and insistence that this tragedy was caused by a mental health issue, has been their latest tactic at taking him down.

With a rise in anger and misguided rage, comes an increased threat level, which we’re seeing unfold around the White House after Secret Service made an especially alarming discovery. There has been no shortage of White House lockdowns since Trump has been in office, caused by mysterious cars parked where they don’t belong against the front gate, or suspicious packages found in this same area.

Now, 24 hours after another car left at the front gate cause the roads around the White House to be sealed off and the entire area evacuated, a van intentionally ran the fence in that area. President Trump was inside the White House at the time of the vehicular attack. The driver is in custody and authorities have released what’s behind these threats and today’s attack.

USA Today reports of today’s intentional ambush on the White House:

The U.S. Secret Service has arrested a woman who authorities say deliberately drove her car into a security barrier near the White House Friday around 3:30 p.m. while President Trump was inside.

The White House was on lockdown for about half an hour. No shots were fired and Trump, who had a news conference planned with Australia Prime Minster Malcolm Turnbull, was never in danger, according to the Secret Service.

Turnbull was also in the White House when the lockdown was initiated and left around 4 p.m.

The woman detained by the Secret Service is suspected to have intentionally crashed her vehicle into a barricade along the perimeter of the White House, an official with knowledge of the matter said.

With the suspect in custody who was reportedly in a different vehicle today than that which was found yesterday and ultimately cleared of an explosive threat, authorities were able to determine through questioning what caused this attack. The reason was the left’s worst nightmare as it’s the common denominator in shooting attacks, including the recent Florida shooting, and other senseless ambushes.

“Law enforcement sources told CNN she appeared to have mental health issues and is known to the Secret Service,” according to the Daily Mail. “The white vehicle remained at the scene afterwards with its rear windshield smashed. Its license plate was from Tennessee. The woman’s condition is not known, but police say no law enforcement officials were hurt.”

NBC News said that the woman’s name was not immediately released. There’s no word if or when that will happen. However, it’s become evidently clear within the past week that mental health is a major issue in America, leading to senseless attacks that could perhaps be prevented if the attention wasn’t misguided on gun control as the cause. At the root of all of these ambushes, threats against our president or innocent citizens calls for assassination, and more senseless mass assaults is a person suffering unaddressed mental illness.

The left will not blame the van for attacking the White House today, it was the mentally ill person driving it who did it. Is this because we can’t ban vans? Using their gun control argument after the Florida shooting last week, they should be pressing for control on cars as tools of homicide. Afterall, this has been terrorists latest tool in an attack. They won’t argue that this time since it doesn’t fit their narrative and the target was President Trump, who liberals dislike anyway and often speak freely about assassinating.

Every threat that’s caused the White House to go on lockdown in a little over a year has been from a deranged liberal who feels empowered to do these terroristic things. The left perpetuates hate against our president and conservative citizens and drives mentally ill people to do horrible things or at least threaten or attempt them. Maybe there needs to be control based on liberalism?

The numerous security breaches at the White House since the Trumps have lived there is not because of him, it’s due to the instability that Democrats instill in their liberal followers who are more than willing to do their dirty work.

It began with a series of “fence jumpers,” then, countless “mystery packages” found on the property. Now it’s escalated to people ramming barriers with their cars. One can’t help but wonder if all of these failed attempts are “test runs” for a bigger event that homegrown terrorist or others are preparing for to see what they could successfully get away with.

Continue Reading

Featured

BREAKING From Florida: Gun Owners Being FORCED Against Their Will – NOT Going Well!

Published

on

In the aftermath of the Parkland, Florida school shooting, the immediate call for gun control emerged before the victims of Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School were even removed from the building. The pushed increased as the media machine went into overdrive to promote it, despite not every victim supporting the idea as a solution for stopping shootings. The coverage has been constant, exclusively showing advocates of abolishing the Second Amendment, which seems to have been effective.

The fight against Americans’ right to self-protection is on across the nation but has just entered dangerous and exceptionally unconstitutional territory in the state of Florida. Reacting to people’s often exaggerated emotions about the issue, Florida Governor Rick Scott has decided to go against all gun owners in his typically pro-gun state and force them against their will in a sickening way that more than appeases anti-gun activists.

Despite Governor Scott admitting within hours of the shooting that the FBI had failed at preventing this tragedy by not responding to multiple reports regarding Nikolas Cruz and didn’t follow protocol, he’s since changed his tune and decided guns are to blame for this atrocity. As such, he just announced what he’s doing to take action against people’s rights to protection, rather than making the FBI pay for their overwhelming failure that could have prevented the massacre.

The Daily Beast reports:

In response to last week’s Parkland school shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, Florida Gov. Rick Scott announced a plan to require “all individuals purchasing firearms” in the state to be 21 or older, ban the “purchase or sale” of bump-stock devices, and prohibit sales to “violent or mentally ill” buyers.

In a break with the White House, Scott also said he would not support President Trump’s initiative to arm teachers with concealed-carry weapons, saying that “My focus is law enforcement… Let teachers focus on teaching.” He also proposed “a half a billion dollars for school safety and mental-health initiatives.” The state of Florida “can’t trust the federal process,” he said, and had to take matters into its own hands. Scott declined to ban the AR-15—the weapon used in the Parkland attack—noting “banning specific weapons is not going to fix this.”

This comes as President Trump doubled down on his support of concealed-carry in classrooms during his Conservative Political Action Conference speech Friday morning.

The age restriction being suggested is absolutely assinine since soldiers are trained and trusted with all manner of guns at the age of 18 to fight for our rights in war, but are denied one of those rights if they want to buy their own gun for self-protection at home. How or why should a soldier have to wait three years after entering the military to buy a gun they are given in service? Scott’s intentions to impose the age limit is forcing responsible people against their will and their God-given right, to wait years before being able to legally protect themselves. Meanwhile, anyone with violent intentions will still arm themselves through illegal means, because they don’t care about laws.

Gun control can’t collect all the firearms already out in America, which is to the tune of one gun for every man, woman, and child. Nikolas Cruz was on a mission and would have gotten a gun to execute his plan regardless of age or ability to buy one legally. Chicago, with the strictest gun laws in the nation, proves this to be the case for criminals as the number one city in America with the most gun-related deaths.

Nikolas Cruz didn’t use a bump stock to commit mass murder so to ban that now has nothing to do with this massacre and everything to do with giving into liberals who know nothing about bump stocks but have been complaining about them since the Las Vegas massacre in October. Gun enthusiast with no ill intention may be forced against their will to accept this rule if they wanted one but won’t be able to get one.

This was a surprising move for Scott who seems to be caving to the constant noise from the left who are insistent on blaming an object and not solving the real problem causing these atrocities. However, while the governor is giving in a little to the left, he did offer some consolation to conservatives. He didn’t ban AR-15’s, which liberals have commonly and incorrectly claim are automatic/machine guns. His proposal to fund school safety and mental health initiatives is a start to keeping our schools safer since it addresses the true cause of these killings. Every school needs armed guards since the mental health in would-be shooters is difficult to address effectively by means of prevention. As such, schools and individuals should be allowed to protect themselves against any threat to life they’re faced with.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Trending

BECOME A FREEDOM DAILY INSIDER
Thanks for sharing! We invite you to keep in the loop on important stories like this one by submitting your email address below.